Secret Copyright Treaty Leaks – Goes Viral
Nov 4th, 2009 | By Rex Gradeless | Category: Copyright, Featured, Lead Article, Privacy, Social Media, Web 2.0If you're new here, and interested in using social media in the legal profession, you may want to subscribe to the RSS feed or follow us on Twitter @Rex7, @lbergus, and @JoshCamson. Thank you for visiting SocialMediaLawStudent.com.
According to BoingBoing.net, the internet chapter of the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement, a secret copyright treaty whose text Obama’s administration refused to disclose due to “national security” concerns, has leaked. It’s bad. It says:
- That ISPs have to proactively police copyright on user-contributed material. This means that it will be impossible to run a service like Flickr or YouTube or Blogger, since hiring enough lawyers to ensure that the mountain of material uploaded every second isn’t infringing will exceed any hope of profitability.
- That ISPs have to cut off the Internet access of accused copyright infringers or face liability. This means that your entire family could be denied to the internet — and hence to civic participation, health information, education, communications, and their means of earning a living — if one member is accused of copyright infringement, without access to a trial or counsel.
- Mandatory prohibitions on breaking DRM, even if doing so for a lawful purpose (e.g., to make a work available to disabled people; for archival preservation; because you own the copyrighted work that is locked up with DRM)
- That the whole world must adopt US-style “notice-and-takedown” rules that require ISPs to remove any material that is accused — again, without evidence or trial — of infringing copyright. This has proved a disaster in the US and other countries, where it provides an easy means of censoring material, just by accusing it of infringing copyright.
The ACTA Internet Chapter: Putting the Pieces Together
To make matters worse, the chapter has gone viral. Here were the latest counts on BoingBoing.net:
1828 Diggs
1704 Facebook Shares
2067 Tweets
What do you think? Comment below.
Related posts:
- YouTube v. Viacom: What This Means for User Generated Content
- What Creative Commons Means for Future Lawyers
- The Consequences of Being a Legally Clueless Celebrity Online
- Best Practices in Fair Use for Online Video
- How to Identify If You Are Tweeting With a Lawyer
- How to Use Google Images Without Getting Sued
- A Legal Perspective: Google Fast Flip
- Social Media Law Student Microblog Posts and Links
- How Bloggers Can Legally Find Premium Images
- How to Spot a Fake Blogger





















